Second Update on Native Village of Kivalina v. Exxon

Jump to Comments

Here is the response brief to the motion to dismiss (here): opposition-to-motion-to-dismiss

And here is the main oil company reply brief: oil-company-reply-brief

And one from Shell Oil: shell-reply-brief

And, of course, here is the complaint that started it all.

1 Comment

Filed under Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, Environmental, Research

Tags: Article III standing, climate change, global warming, Native Village of Kivalina v. Exxon, Northern District of California, nuisance