29 Palms Band v. Schwarzeneggar State Income Tax Case

As this article reports, the 29 Palms Band sued the State of California over gaming-related income on behalf of its off-reservation members. The court granted an earlier motion to dismiss, but allowed the Band leave to file an amended complaint on whether IGRA preempts state taxation.

Here are the materials so far:

California Motion to Dismiss

29 Palms Band Opposition

California Reply

Sept DCT Order Granting California Motion to Dismiss

29 Palms Band Amended Complaint

California Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint

1 Comment

Filed under Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, gaming, Research, taxation

One Response to 29 Palms Band v. Schwarzeneggar State Income Tax Case

  1. Pingback: California Appellate Court Holds that State May Tax Per Caps of Indians Living on Other Reservations « Turtle Talk

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s