Here:
Questions presented:
I. Should this Court grant this petition to address the court of appeals’ and district court’s lack of subject matter jurisdiction over this matter?
II. Should this Court grant this petition to address the court of appeals’ and district court’s erroneous interpretation of 25 U.S.C. § 410 as not applying to the assignment and attachment of Evans’s Individual Indian Money Account?III. Should this Court grant this petition to address the court of appeals’ and district court’s erroneous grant of summary judgment when there are genuine issues of material fact?
IV. Should this Court grant this petition to address the court of appeals’ and district court’s erroneous exclusion of Evan’s expert evidence on damages?
American Indian Tribal Law
Facing the Future: The Indian Child Welfare Act at 30
The Eagle Returns: The Legal History of the Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians
The Indian Civil Rights Act at Forty
Pingback: SCT Relists Arctic Slope Native Assn. v. Sebelius Petition (Two Other Indian Law Petitions Denied) | Turtle Talk