Here:
Here are the questions presented:
1. Does Public Law 280 (18 U.S.C. § 1162 and 28 U.S.C. (1360) give the State of Wisconsin jurisdiction to involuntarily civilly commit a member of a federally recognized Indian tribe who is a legal resident of his tribal reservation under Minnesota’s Commitment and Treatment Act (Minn. Stat. Ch. 253B?)
2. Was Minnesota’s involuntary civil commitment of Beaulieu contrary to, and/or an unreasonable application of this Court’s clearly established law limiting Public Law 280′s grant of civil jurisdiction to private civil matters?
Lower court decision here.
American Indian Tribal Law
Facing the Future: The Indian Child Welfare Act at 30
The Eagle Returns: The Legal History of the Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians
The Indian Civil Rights Act at Forty
Pingback: SCT Issues Call for Response to Minn. AG re: Beaulieu Cert Petition | Turtle Talk