Federal Court Affirms Mass. Gaming Law Granting Preference to Tribes

Here is the lengthy opinion.

No bones about it. This is a scary opinion delving at length into the constitutional infirmities of the political status classification doctrine first articulated in Morton v. Mancari. This judge would apply strict scrutiny but for the Mancari precedent (one he finds weak at best).

A case to watch to be sure, since KG Urban no doubt smells blood in the water. And Massachusetts will no doubt defend this law diligently.

Update: Paul Clement represents the plaintiffs.

News coverage here, via Pechanga.

Briefs and other materials are here.

This entry was posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, gaming, Research and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Federal Court Affirms Mass. Gaming Law Granting Preference to Tribes

  1. Pingback: More Materials in KG Urban v. Patrick | Turtle Talk

  2. Pingback: Opening Brief in KG Urban v. Patrick (Mass. State Gaming Case) | Turtle Talk

  3. Pingback: Indian Gaming and Buying Local | Turtle Talk

  4. Pingback: Top 20 Indian Law Stories on Turtle Talk for 2012 (plus a few others) | Turtle Talk

  5. Pingback: Indian Affairs, Adoption, and Race: The Baby Veronica Case Comes to Washington | CCLAH

  6. Pingback: Feminists and the Baby Veronica Case | Somebody's Children

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s