The court found that the denial of transfer to tribal court was not an abuse of discretion by the trial court. In this case the blood quantum requirements of the tribe initially led to a determination that the children were not eligible for membership, though it turns out the determination was in error. Because of the error, the tribe was late to intervene, and the trial court denied transfer. The State and the GAL opposed transfer, and the court used a best interests standard to deny transfer. It’s not a pretty opinion and touches on a number of the usual issues involved in these cases (permanency, termination of parental rights, whether foster care placement and termination proceedings are separate or intrinsically linked).
- Second Circuit Affirms Cayuga Immunity from Seneca County Tax Foreclosure Relying on Bay Mills Decision
- Opening Ninth Circuit Brief in Yakama/King Mountain Tax Dispute with US
- Witness List and Written Testimony in July 23 SCIA Hearing on Indian Gaming
- Blast from the Past: 2009 MSU ILPC Report on the History of Michigan Tribal-State Relations
- Michigan Tribal Judges Invited to MDTC "Meet the Judges" Event (Oct. 2, 2014)