Iowa SCT Dismisses Disciplinary Complaint Against Sac and Fox Attorney–Take Two

First opinion.

Opinion here.

Legal Profession Blog Post.

This entry was posted in Author: Kate E. Fort and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Iowa SCT Dismisses Disciplinary Complaint Against Sac and Fox Attorney–Take Two

  1. vance gillette says:

    A complaint against an attorney should be handled in the forum WHERE the dispute arose. Here, the Tama tribal court (dispute over software etc).

    Simply, state courts or disciplinary agents tend to disregard tribal law and
    authority, which should be the forum to resolve the dispute. THis is contrary to Williams v. Lee USSC l959 (state court would infringe on tribal authority).

    Unfortunately, mad people often file a bogus grievance against an Indian
    attorney (or white attorney who handles Indian cases), as a revenge tactic.
    THis burns up needless time and expense, and drags an attorney thru the
    mud. Lastly, the Iowa court found no violation – and in doing so, brushed off the Comity argument (matter should be handled in Tama tribal court).

    vance gillette attorney
    new town north dakota

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s