Federal Court Order Compliance with Western Sky Financial Tribal Arbitration Provision

Here are the materials in Inetianbor v. Cashcall Inc. (S.D. Fla.):

DCT Order Granting Motion to Compel Arbitration

Cashcall Motion to Compel Arbitration or Dismiss

Inetianbor Opposition

Cashcall Reply

Inetianbor State Court Complaint

Inetianbor State Court Complaint Amendment

An excerpt:

Here, Defendant argues that the arbitration agreement, by its plain language, covers Plaintiff’s claims. The Court agrees. The terms of the agreement are clear: all disputes between the borrower and the holder of the Note or the holder’s servicer must be settled through arbitration. See Loan Agreement at 5-6. In this suit, Plaintiff seeks damages from Cashcall, the servicer of the note, for actions related to Cashcall’s servicing and collecting on the note. See Amended Complaint at 2. Therefore, Plaintiff’s claims fall within the scope of the arbitration provision.

This entry was posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, economic development, Research and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Federal Court Order Compliance with Western Sky Financial Tribal Arbitration Provision

  1. Pingback: Update in Inetianbor v. Cashcall (Western Sky Financial): Federal Court Reopens Case | Turtle Talk

  2. Pingback: Dispute with Western Sky Financial Heads to Arbitration with CRST Elder Robert Chasing Hawk | Turtle Talk

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s