NYTs Alleges Vast Fraud in Federal Settlements for Race Discrimination against Minority Farmers

Here. The worst allegations involve Black farmers but there are claims against the Keepseagle settlement, too.

An excerpt:

A 2010 settlement with Native Americans was contentious for its own reasons. Justice Department lawyers argued that the $760 million agreement far outstripped the potential cost of a defeat in court. Agriculture officials said not that many farmers would file claims.

That prediction proved prophetic. Only $300 million in claims were filed, leaving nearly $400 million in the control of plaintiffs’ lawyers to be distributed among a handful of nonprofit organizations serving Native American farmers. Two and a half years later, the groups have yet to be chosen. It is unclear how many even exist.

And:

The Native-American case was clearly problematic for the government. The federal judge overseeing the case, Emmet G. Sullivan, had already certified the plaintiffs as a class, although only to seek changes in government practices and policies. He postponed a decision on whether they could seek monetary damages as a class.

But Justice Department litigators were far from unarmed. If they lost on damages, case law suggested that the decision might be reversed. Depositions had revealed many of the individual farmers’ complaints to be shaky. And federal judges had already scornfully rejected the methodology of the plaintiffs’ expert, a former Agriculture Department official named Patrick O’Brien, in the women’s case.

Mr. O’Brien contended that white farmers were two to three times as likely as Native Americans to receive federal farm loans in the 1980s and 1990s than were other farmers. But the government’s expert, Gordon C. Rausser, a professor of economics and statistics at the University of California, Berkeley, had produced a 340-page report stating that Mr. O’Brien’s conclusions were based “in a counter-factual world” and that Native Americans had generally fared as well as white male farmers.

Professor Rausser was astounded when, with both sides gearing up for trial in late 2009, the government began settlement negotiations. “If they had gone to trial, the government would have prevailed,” he said.

***

Agriculture officials predicted that only 5,300 Native Americans were likely to file claims. The plaintiffs’ lawyers, whose fees were to be based on a percentage of the settlement, estimated up to 19,000 claims.

Only 4,400 people filed claims, with 3,600 winning compensation at a cost of roughly $300 million. That left $460 million unspent — of which roughly $400 million under the terms of the settlement must be given to nonprofit groups that aid Native American farmers.

***

The remaining $60.8 million will go to the plaintiffs’ lawyers, led by the Washington firm Cohen, Milstein, Sellers & Toll. In court papers, the firm argued that the size of the payment was justified partly by the fact that the settlement nearly equaled the maximum estimate of economic damages. Joseph M. Sellers, the lead counsel, acknowledged the unspent amount was unexpectedly big. But “absent a court order,” he said, “we don’t intend to return it.”

3 thoughts on “NYTs Alleges Vast Fraud in Federal Settlements for Race Discrimination against Minority Farmers

  1. evelyn roanhorse April 26, 2013 / 6:53 am

    Interested in your Turtle Talk T-Shirt, but cannot download the order form.

  2. ilpc April 26, 2013 / 9:19 am

    Hmm. It’s a pdf and we’ve been able to download it. Feel free to email me at fort@law.msu.edu and I can send you what you need.

  3. v April 26, 2013 / 7:20 pm

    Re: Keeps Eagle settlement with Indian farmers and ranchers. For years in North Dakota, Indian operators could not get loans. 40 years. Example, white banks said trust land could not be used.

    Next, federal programs denied loans to Indians, while local white ranchers or farmers were funded. This forced Indian land owners off their land. Now Indian lands are leased in 5 year BIA units. Those with ties to the tribal council can get a big range unit, and sub-lease for cattle grazing. This group gets the $50,000 settlement. The “real land owners” get zero.

    Overall, its good the Indian operators get funds. Compare, others who grow fat off “Welfare” subsidies, e.g. oil companies [with billiions in profits], tobacco growers, wheat growers, and so on.

    vance gillette indian attorney, ft berthold Ind res. no dak.

Comments are closed.