Dispute with Western Sky Financial Heads to Arbitration with CRST Elder Robert Chasing Hawk

Here are the updated materials in Inetianbor v. Cashcall (S.D. Fla.):

DCT Order Compelling Arbitration

Renewed Motion to Compel

Inetianbor Opposition

57-main [Cashcall Reply]

57-1 [Affidavit of Robert Chasing Hawk]

57-3

57-4 [Consumer loan agreement]

Previous posts on this case are here and here.

This entry was posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, Research and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Dispute with Western Sky Financial Heads to Arbitration with CRST Elder Robert Chasing Hawk

  1. Pingback: Seventh Circuit Issues Limited Remand(?) in Jackson v. Payday Financial Appeal | Turtle Talk

  2. Pingback: Update in Inetianbor v. Cash Call (Western Sky Financial) — Arbitrator Alleged Biased — Court Finds Irrelevant | Turtle Talk

  3. Pingback: Federal Court Reopens Inetianbor v. Cashcall (Again) After Plaintiff Shows Reservation Arbitration a Sham | Turtle Talk

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s