Here are the updated materials in Inetianbor v. Cashcall (S.D. Fla.):
DCT Order Compelling Arbitration
Renewed Motion to Compel
57-main [Cashcall Reply]
57-1 [Affidavit of Robert Chasing Hawk]
57-4 [Consumer loan agreement]
Previous posts on this case are here and here.
Pingback: Seventh Circuit Issues Limited Remand(?) in Jackson v. Payday Financial Appeal | Turtle Talk
Pingback: Update in Inetianbor v. Cash Call (Western Sky Financial) — Arbitrator Alleged Biased — Court Finds Irrelevant | Turtle Talk
Pingback: Federal Court Reopens Inetianbor v. Cashcall (Again) After Plaintiff Shows Reservation Arbitration a Sham | Turtle Talk
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Google+ account. ( Log Out / Change )
Connecting to %s
Notify me of follow-up comments via email.
Notify me of new posts via email.
Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.
Join 1,789 other followers
Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.