Update in Federal Trade Commission v. Payday Financial (Martin Webb) — Defendants Ordered to Pay FTC More than $400K

Matthew L.M. Fletcher

Here are the new materials in Federal Trade Commission v. Payday Financial LLC (D. S.D.):

52 PF Motion for Summary J

58 FTC Response

60 PF Reply

94 FTC Motion for Summary J

103 PF Opposition

114 FTC Reply

117 DCT Order Denying PF Motion for Summary J

120 FTC Memorandum of Supplemental Authority

120-1 Exhibit A

120-3 Exhibit C

131 DCT Order Granting Partial Summary J to FTC

Materials from the complaint here.

2 thoughts on “Update in Federal Trade Commission v. Payday Financial (Martin Webb) — Defendants Ordered to Pay FTC More than $400K”

  1. RG November 15, 2013 / 11:21 pm

    Western Sky turned over their accounts to Delbert Services which is a collection agency even though customers were not late in payments. They continue to claim they are exempt from any State laws. In addition, Pay Day Finance is taking loans for Western Sky – they just change the code in their computer system. So Western Sky is not out of business.

  2. RG November 16, 2013 / 4:17 pm

    Western Sky’s Terms of Use states the company is a Native American owned business operating within the boundaries of the Cheyenne River Sioux Reservation. However, the disclaimer on the web page states “Western Sky is owned wholly by an individual member of the Cheyenne River Sioux tribe…:not” owned or operated by the Cheyenne River Sioux tribe, and …operated within the “exterior” boundaries.
    Why they discrepancy?

Comments are closed.