Sixth Circuit Reverses in Michigan v. Sault Ste. Marie Tribe

Here is the opinion:

Michigan v SSM CA6 Opinion

An excerpt:

Because the State is not suing to enjoin a class III gaming activity, but instead a trust submission under MILCSA, § 2710(d)(7)(A)(ii) of IGRA does not abrogate the Tribe’s sovereign immunity, and the district court lacked jurisdiction. The issue of whether class III gaming on the casino property will violate IGRA if the Tribe’s MILCSA trust submission is successful is not ripe for adjudication because it depends on contingent future events that may never occur. The injunction was therefore not properly entered.

Briefs are here.

Lower court materials here.

This entry was posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, gaming, Michigan Indian, Research, sovereign immunity and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Sixth Circuit Reverses in Michigan v. Sault Ste. Marie Tribe

  1. Pingback: En Banc Petition Materials in Michigan v. Sault Tribe | Turtle Talk

  2. Pingback: Sixth Ciruit Denies Sault Tribe Motion to Reconsider Stay | Turtle Talk

  3. Pingback: Michigan Files Cert Petition against Sault Tribe in Lansing Casino Controversy | Turtle Talk

  4. Pingback: Michigan Files Cert Petition against Sault Tribe in Lansing Casino Controversy | Round House Talk

  5. Pingback: Updated Materials in Michigan v. Sault Tribe — State Seeks to Sue Tribal Officials | Turtle Talk

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s