Alaska SCT Holds State Courts Cannot Adjudicate Restricted Alaska Native Townsite Titles

Here is the opinion in Hawkins v. Attatayuk.

An excerpt:

Harold Hawkins and Rosalind Attatayuk married and lived together in St. Michael until 1981, when they dissolved their marriage. Hawkins was awarded the couple’s home in the dissolution and continued to reside on the property, which was federally owned. In 1993 Attatayuk applied for and received a restricted townsite deed to the land by allegedly fraudulent means. She brought a trespass action against Hawkins, alleging that she had undisputed title to the land. Hawkins denied this allegation. The superior court ruled on summary judgment that Attatayuk’s restricted townsite deed gave her title to the land. Because Alaska state courts do not have subject matter jurisdiction to adjudicate title or right to possession of restricted townsite property, the only issue presented in this appeal is whether the superior court adjudicated title to the land in question. We hold that the superior court did adjudicate title and, as a result, exceeded its jurisdiction.

2 thoughts on “Alaska SCT Holds State Courts Cannot Adjudicate Restricted Alaska Native Townsite Titles

  1. Rory M. Jackson April 11, 2014 / 2:50 pm

    I discovered that the design of the fee-for-service “OPEN CARD” and the way CMS implements the program discriminates against Native Americans. I filed a Federal Civil Rights Complaint against the State of Oregon and can not get anyone to help me with this issue. When ACA was written, CMS is the center spoke and hub for the entire US. Native Americans are the only group subjected to this type of treatment. US Senators, State Representatives, and the news media were all made aware of the situation, and turned their backs. Please visit the website to get a better understanding of the problem. Is there any Indian Law that covers this area? Any help you can provide is deeply appreciated.

    Rory Jackson

Comments are closed.