- Eleventh Circuit Rules in Favor of Seminole Tribe in Title VII Matter
- Federal Court Affirms that Tribal Cops Working under BIA Contract May Be Federal Officers for Certain Purposes
- Nooksack Petition for Review in Sovereign Immunity Appeal
- Three Remanded for ICWA Notice Deficiency Cases out of California
- Fifth Circuit Holds Eagle Act Regulations May Violate RFRA
Category Archives: IGRA
Here (PDF): Click agenda to register.
Here: 26 US Cross Motion for Summary J Also: 27-1 Fond du Lac Proposed Amicus Brief The City’s motion is here.
New Mexico Files Suit to Challenge Application of Part 291 Secretary Procedures to Pueblo of Pojoaque
Here is the complaint in State of New Mexico v. Jewell (D. N.M.): 1 Complaint Here are the materials in Pueblo of Pojoaque v. State of New Mexico (D. N.M.) referenced in the complaint: 11 Pueblo of Pojoaque Motion for … Continue reading →
Here are the briefs in Cosentino v. Pechanga Band of Luiseño Mission Indians: Cosentino Opening Brief Pechanga Answer Brief Repky brief TK Lower court materials (C.D. Cal.): 12-1 Pechanga Motion to Dismiss 13 Cosentino Response 20 DCT Amended Order
Here are the materials in Jamul Action Committee v. Stevens (E.D. Cal.): 21 Federal Motion to Dismiss 22 Jamul Indian Village Motion to Fiile Amicus Brief 22-1 Jamul Indian Village Motion to Dismiss 30 Jamul Action Committee Response to Jamul … Continue reading →
The California Legislature has till the end of August 2014 to decide on two bills that would regulate online poker. Both bills are backed by different interest groups, including various tribes. The bills are AB 2291 and SB 1366. Additionally, the … Continue reading →
Here: Witnesses: The Honorable Paul A. Gosar Representative-United States House of Representatives The Honorable Raul M. Grijalva Representative-United States House of Representatives Panel 1 The Honorable Kevin Washburn Assistant Secretary-Indian Affairs-United States Department of the Interior View Testimony Mr. Jonodev … Continue reading →
Here are the materials in State of Wisconsin v. Ho-Chunk Nation (W.D. Wis.): 25 HCN Brief 22 Wisconsin Brief 29 Wisconsin Response Brief 32 Ho-Chunk Response Brief 35 DCT Order An excerpt: The state of Wisconsin has brought this case … Continue reading →
Here are updated materials in State of Michigan v. Sault Ste. Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians (W.D. Mich.): 53-1 Michigan Motion to Revise DCT Order Dismissing Tribal Officials 55 Michigan Response to Motion to Dismiss Sault Tribe’s motion is here.
Here: Oklahoma Supplemental Brief re Bay Mills Tribal Supplemental Brief re Bay Mills The Tenth Circuit previously abated this matter pending the outcome in Michigan v. Bay Mills.