Second Circuit Rejects Jay Treaty Statute Defense to Criminal Prosecution

Here are the materials in United States v. Malachowski:

Appellant Brief

Appellee Brief

CA2 Order

An excerpt:

Malachowski invokes 8 U.S.C. § 1359, which allows American Indians born in Canada to freely cross the borders of the United States, and contends that he was wrongfully convicted of counts three, four, five, and six. The statute extends only “to persons who possess at least 50 per centum of blood of the American Indian race,” and we previously expressed skepticism that Malachowksi satisfied his burden of proof on this point. See Malachowski, 415 F. App’x at 313 (noting the “dearth of evidence respecting [Malachowski’s] ancestry”). Neither the immigration officer assigned to Malachowksi’s case nor the ATF agent investigating Malachowksi unearthed evidence of his American Indian heritage. G.A. 58, 146-47. And when Malachowski was arrested by a border patrol agent and asked “Do you claim any legal status in the United States?” Malachowski answered “No.” G.A. 54. During this encounter, Malachowski also did not “claim any other citizenship or nationality.” Id. Malachowksi has accordingly fallen short of prevailing on this claim.

One thought on “Second Circuit Rejects Jay Treaty Statute Defense to Criminal Prosecution

  1. Richard Monette September 11, 2015 / 9:26 am

    So did they “reject Jay Treaty defense”? or did they reject this man’s attempt to use it? Bummer — I guess I’ll have to read it.

Comments are closed.