Update in TON Suit against Arizona Officials re: Glendale Casino

Here are the new materials in Tohono O’Odham Nation v. Ducey (D. Ariz.):

82 DCT Order Denying TON Motion for PI

108 TON Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims

111 Bergin Response

115 TON Reply

127 DCT Order

Previous materials are here.

This entry was posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, IGRA, Indian gaming, Research and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Update in TON Suit against Arizona Officials re: Glendale Casino

  1. bignuba says:

    Talk about sour grapes … the state tried for years to block the casino and lost. They appealed and lost again. Now, they still disregard federal law and try to hold up the casino. The tribe should win and be awarded attorney fees for the weak claims asserted. Compare, Ute v. Utah boundary litigation. Sometimes the states refuse to accept reality and continue to litigate loser cases.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s