Here are the new materials in Tohono O’Odham Nation v. Ducey (D. Ariz.):
82 DCT Order Denying TON Motion for PI
108 TON Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims
111 Bergin Response
115 TON Reply
127 DCT Order
Previous materials are here.
Talk about sour grapes … the state tried for years to block the casino and lost. They appealed and lost again. Now, they still disregard federal law and try to hold up the casino. The tribe should win and be awarded attorney fees for the weak claims asserted. Compare, Ute v. Utah boundary litigation. Sometimes the states refuse to accept reality and continue to litigate loser cases.
Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )
You are commenting using your Google+ account. ( Log Out / Change )
Connecting to %s
Notify me of new comments via email.
Notify me of new posts via email.
Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.
Join 12,275 other followers