D. N.M. Denies Motion to Amend Judgment in Water Rights Settlement

Here are the materials in the matter of New Mexico et al v. Aamodt el al, 66-cv-00639 (D. N.M. Sept. 9, 2016):

Doc. 9972 – Response in Opposition to Motion to Approve Settlement Agreement and Entry of Proposed Partial Final Judgment and Decree

Doc. 10543 – Memorandum Opinion and Order Approving Settlement Agreement

Doc. 10567 – Opposed Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment Pursuant to Rule 59(e)

Doc. 10581 – Plaintiffs-In-Intervention the United States, Pueblo de Nambé, Pueblo de Pojoaque, Pueblo de San Ildefonso, and Pueblo de Tesuque’s Response in Opposition to Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment Pursuant to Rule 59(E)

Doc. 10632 – Reply in Support of Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment Pursuant to Rule 59(e)

Doc. 10858 – Memorandum Opinion and Order Denying Opposed Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment Pursuant to Rule 59(e)

About Sarah M Donnelly

Program Coordinator for the Indigenous Law and Policy Center at Michigan State University College of Law.
This entry was posted in Author: Sarah Donnelly, Research, water rights and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s