Briefs in Paradigm Energy v. Fox — Pipeline Construction under Fort Berthold Reservation

Here are the materials so far Paradigm Energy Partners LLC v. Fox (D.N.D.):

5-paradigm-motion-for-tro

8-mha-nation-motion-to-dismiss

20-mha-motion-to-dissolve-tro

21-paradigm-response-to-20

24-mha-reply-in-support-of-8

25-reply-in-support-of-20

This entry was posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, Environmental, Research and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Briefs in Paradigm Energy v. Fox — Pipeline Construction under Fort Berthold Reservation

  1. bignuba says:

    Tough case because tribal council approved ROWs to let company put in oil pipeline. Then when project 99% done, the council issued a stop order. They were sued and judge will likely rule against the tribe. Tribe claims lakebed but using this as a ‘defense’ is problematic.

    The scary part is another pipeline HESS Hawkeye oil pipeline is being built about l5 miles north 0r upriver on the Missouri. The FEDS allows reuse of l959 pipeline and may be an oil leak in a few years. The HESS pipeline is the one the tribe should have fought, but did not.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s