Federal Court Denies Rule 11 Sanctions Motion against Counsel for United Indian Health Services

Here are the materials in United Indian Health Services v. Su (E.D. Cal.):

29-dct-order-dismissing-suit

31-1-motion-for-sanctions

32-opposition

33-reply

35-dct-order-denying-sanctions

This entry was posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, Research, sovereign immunity and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s