Here is the opinion in United States v. Garcia.
The syllabus:
Defendant failed to avail himself of the right to inspect jury selection records, and the district court did not err in failing to order sua sponte that those records be made available to him; claim that the jury did not represent a fair cross section of the community and that the jury selection process used by the district court improperly excluded Native Americans from the venire is rejected; this court has previously upheld North Dakota's jury selection plan, which draws its pools of prospective jurors randomly from lists of persons who voted in the last presidential election; jury administrator's testimony that there were not usually one or two Native Americans on the potential jury panel did not constitute a prima facie showing that Native Americans have been substantially under-represented on venires over a significant period of time.
Turtle Talk 