Federal Court Rejects Sag Chip and Nottawaseppi Huron Potawatomi Motions to Intervene in Bay Mills Gaming Case

Here are the materials in Bay Mills Indian Community v. Snyder (W.D. Mich.):

47 Saginaw Chippewa Motion to Intervene

54 Michigan Motion for Summary J

54 Nottawaseppi Motion to Intervene

61 Michigan Opposition to SCIT Motion

62 BMIC Opposition to SCIT Motion

67 Michigan Opposition to NHB Motion

68 BMIC Opposition to NHB Motion

69 DCT Order

This entry was posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, Indian gaming, Michigan Indian, Research and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s