In Major Ruling, Tenth Circuit Holds Muscogee (Creek) Reservation Boundaries Remain Intact

Tenth Circuit in Murphy v. Royal holds that allotted Muscogee (Creek) Nation reservation in Oklahoma has not been disestablished, reversing State death penalty conviction of Creek tribal member.

MURPHY v ROYAL OPINION

Prior Posts:

Updated Materials in Murphy v. Royal (No. 07-7068, Tenth Circuit)

and

Muscogee (Creek) Reservation Boundaries at Issue in Tenth Circuit Death Penalty Habeas Appeal

 

This entry was posted in Author: Teresa Walrod, Research and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to In Major Ruling, Tenth Circuit Holds Muscogee (Creek) Reservation Boundaries Remain Intact

  1. Pingback: Kanji & Katzen, PLLC, Statement on Tenth Circuit’s Historic Decision Recognizing Muscogee (Creek) Nation’s 1866 Reservation Boundaries | Turtle Talk

  2. Pingback: Cherokee Nation Says Recent 10th Cir. Decision Supports Tribal Court Jurisdiction Over Drugmakers | Turtle Talk

  3. Pingback: Kialegee Tribal Town Sues DOI Over Jurisdiction After Muscogee (Creek) Nation Raid | Turtle Talk

  4. Pingback: Oklahoma En Banc Petition in Murphy v. Royal | Turtle Talk

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s