Category Archives: fee to trust

D.C. Circuit Affirms Interior Trust Acquisition for North Fork Rancheria of Mono Indians

Here is the opinion in Stand Up for California! v. Dept. of Interior: Stand Up Opinion Briefs here.

Posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, fee to trust, Indian gaming, Research | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Ninth Circuit Denies En Banc Review of Ione Casino Challenges

Here are the materials in No Casino in Plymouth v. Zinke: Ione adv No Casino – 9th Circuit – Order Denying No Casino Petition for Panel Rehearing or Rehearing En Banc filed 01-11-2018 Ione Band Response [No Casino] No Casino … Continue reading

Posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, fee to trust, IGRA, Indian gaming, Research | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Tenth Circuit Briefs in Cherokee Nation v. Zinke (UKB Trust Acquisition)

Here they are (so far); Federal Brief Lower court materials in Cherokee Nation v. Jewell here.

Posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, fee to trust, Research | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Federal Court Rejects Casino Opponent Demand to Supplement Administrative Record with Materials on the Legal Status of Trust Land (North Fork Rancheria of Mono Indians)

Here are the materials in Club One Casino v. Dept. of Interior (E.D. Cal.): 22 motion to supplement record 25 interior response 26 reply 33 dct order

Posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, fee to trust, IGRA, Indian gaming, Research | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

D.C. Circuit Affirms Amador County Cannot Challenge IGRA ‘Reservation’ Status of Buena Vista Rancheria

Here is the unpublished opinion in Amador County v. Dept. of Interior: CADC Unpublished Opinion Here are the briefs.

Posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, fee to trust, Research | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Gregory Ablavsky Guest Post: What Justice Thomas Gets Wrong About Constitutional History: Part 2—Ratification, Natelson, and Territorial Integrity

Professor Ablavsky is the author of “Beyond the Commerce Clause.” Part I is here. What Justice Thomas Gets Wrong About Constitutional History: Part 2—Ratification, Natelson, and Territorial Integrity One interesting aspect about Upstate Citizens is the underlying dispute’s highly ironic … Continue reading

Posted in fee to trust, Guest Post: Gregory Ablavsky, legal history, Supreme Court | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Patchak v. Zinke Oral Argument Transcript

Here: Oral Argument Transcript  

Posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, fee to trust, Michigan Indian, Research, Supreme Court | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

SCOTUSBlog (Ronald Mann) Preview of Patchak v. Zinke

Here. An excerpt, and a little horn tooting: The most telling argument for the government is the recitation (in an amicus brief filed by a group of law professors) of the dozens of statutes Congress has adopted through the centuries … Continue reading

Posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, fee to trust, Legislation, Michigan Indian, Research, Supreme Court | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Interior Delays Tribal Consulation on Proposed Revisions to 25 CFR Part 151 to 2018

Here.

Posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, fee to trust, Regulations, Research | Tagged | Leave a comment

Litigation Update on Cases Addressing the “Under Federal Jurisdiction” Requirement of the Indian Reorganization Act (Plus Other Things)

Here. Prepared for the FBA’s DC Indian Law Conference this Friday!

Posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, fee to trust, Regulations, Research | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment