Category Archives: Indian gaming
Here is the petition in County of Amador v. Dept. of the Interior: Cert Petition Questions presented: 1. Whether Congress intended the phrase “under Federal jurisdiction,” as used in the 1934 Act, to encompass a tribe that, as of June 18, 1934, had no … Continue reading →
Tribal Gaming Can Help to Fight Human Trafficking Kathryn Isom-Clause Often “hidden in plain sight,” millions of people are exploited for criminal profit every year. These people are victims of human trafficking, or modern-day slavery. Human trafficking occurs across the … Continue reading →
Here is the opinion: Opinion Briefs here.
Here: Opening Brief Tribal Answer Brief Federal Answer Brief Lower court materials here.
Here is the opinion in Mendoza v. Isleta Resort & Casino & Hudson Ins. (N.M. Ct. App.): CA35,520
Here are the materials in State of Texas v. Ysleta del Sur Pueblo (W.D. Tex.): 9 texas motion for pi 17 tribe response 18 reply 54 tribe supplemental memo re cause of action 59 texas supplemental brief 64 magistrate report … Continue reading →
Here is the opinion in Zaunbrecher v. Martin: 17-0932opi This case previously reached the Supreme Court, and was held pending the decision in Lewis v. Clarke. Materials here and here.
Here: Chemehuevi Opening Brief California Answer Brief Reply Lower court materials here.
Federal Court Rejects Challenge to Wilton Rancheria Trust Acquisition Made by Acting Interior Official
Here are the materials in Stand Up for California! v. Dept. of Interior (D.D.C.): 33 Stand Up Motion for Summary J 40 Interior Cross Motion 41 Wilton Rancheria Cross Motion 45 Stand Up Reply 49 Wilton Reply 50 Interior Reply … Continue reading →
Here are the materials in State of Texas v. Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas (E.D. Tex.): 74 Texas Motion for Contempt 76 Tribe Motion to Set Aside Judgment 77 Texas Response to 76 80 Tribe Reply in Support of 76 96 Texas … Continue reading →