Tag Archives: D.C. District Court
Links: Tulsa World coverage Download(PDF) complaint in the matter of Kialegee Tribal Town v. Zinke et al, 17-cv-01670 (D.C. Circuit August 17, 2017): Doc. 1 – Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief Kialegee Tribal Town is arguing the precedence of … Continue reading →
Here. While hundreds are settling in for the long haul at an encampment to protest the Dakota Access Pipeline, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers confirmed Thursday that the pipeline developer, Energy Transfer Partners, does not yet have a written … Continue reading →
Here is the order in Mackinac Tribe v. Jewell (D. D.C.): 19 DCT Order Briefs are here.
The D.C. District Court granted the NIGC’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed the City’s APA challenge to the Fond-du-Luth NOV. Here is the order in City of Duluth v. National Indian Gaming Commission (D. D.C.): APA case — District … Continue reading →
The Forest County Potawatomi Community has filed a complaint against the Department of the Interior over the disapproval of its gaming compact – the latest development in the Menominee Tribe’s efforts to develop a class III gaming facility in Kenosha, Wisconsin. … Continue reading →
Here: 103 Third Amended Complaint 105 Interior Answer Prior posts here, here, here, and here.
Here is the complaint in Forest County Potawatomi Community v. Jewell (D. D.C.): 1 Complaint An excerpt: For over two years, Plaintiff Forest County Potawatomi Community (the “Community”) has attempted to obtain records from Defendants, pursuant to the Freedom of … Continue reading →
Memorandum and Opinion (111 pages) and Order. ORDERED that, because the rule Revising the Listing of the Gray Wolf (Canis lupus) in the Western Great Lakes (the “Final Rule”), 76 Fed. Reg. 81,666 (Dec. 28, 2011), is arbitrary and capricious and violates the Endangered … Continue reading →
Here are the materials in Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community v. Jewell (D. D.C.): 23 Grand Ronde Motion 24 Clark County Motion 36 Interior Response 39-1 Samish Amicus Brief 44 Cowlitz Motion 54 Grand Ronde Response 59 Clark … Continue reading →
Here is the complaint in Navajo Nation v. United States (D. D.C.): 1 Complaint An excerpt: This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief and money damages brought against the Department and the Secretary for Defendants’ violations of the … Continue reading →