Tag Archives: fee to trust

Ninth Circuit Affirms Interior Decision Favoring Estom Yumeka Maidu Tribe of the Enterprise Rancheria

Here is the opinion in Cachil Dehe Band of Wintun Indians of the Colusa Indian Community v. Zinke. Briefs here.

Posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, fee to trust, IGRA, Research | Tagged , , , ,

D.C. Circuit Rules in Favor of Feds/Tribe in Butte County v. Chaudhuri

Here is the opinion: Opinion Briefs here.

Posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, fee to trust, Indian gaming, Research | Tagged , , , , ,

Ninth Circuit Denies En Banc Review of Ione Casino Challenges

Here are the materials in No Casino in Plymouth v. Zinke: Ione adv No Casino – 9th Circuit – Order Denying No Casino Petition for Panel Rehearing or Rehearing En Banc filed 01-11-2018 Ione Band Response [No Casino] No Casino … Continue reading

Posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, fee to trust, IGRA, Indian gaming, Research | Tagged , , , , ,

Federal Court Rejects Casino Opponent Demand to Supplement Administrative Record with Materials on the Legal Status of Trust Land (North Fork Rancheria of Mono Indians)

Here are the materials in Club One Casino v. Dept. of Interior (E.D. Cal.): 22 motion to supplement record 25 interior response 26 reply 33 dct order

Posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, fee to trust, IGRA, Indian gaming, Research | Tagged , , , ,

Gregory Ablavsky Guest Post: What Justice Thomas Gets Wrong About Constitutional History: Part 2—Ratification, Natelson, and Territorial Integrity

Professor Ablavsky is the author of “Beyond the Commerce Clause.” Part I is here. What Justice Thomas Gets Wrong About Constitutional History: Part 2—Ratification, Natelson, and Territorial Integrity One interesting aspect about Upstate Citizens is the underlying dispute’s highly ironic … Continue reading

Posted in fee to trust, Guest Post: Gregory Ablavsky, legal history, Supreme Court | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Greg Ablavsky Guest Post: What Justice Thomas Gets Wrong About Constitutional History: Part I—the Indian Commerce Clause

SCOTUS denied cert in two cases challenging the constitutionality of Section 5 of the Indian Reorganization Act, the statute that authorizes the Secretary of the Interior to take land into trust for Indian tribes. The petitions are here and here. … Continue reading

Posted in Guest Post: Gregory Ablavsky, legal history, Supreme Court | Tagged , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Litigation Update on Cases Addressing the “Under Federal Jurisdiction” Requirement of the Indian Reorganization Act (Plus Other Things)

Here. Prepared for the FBA’s DC Indian Law Conference this Friday!

Posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, fee to trust, Regulations, Research | Tagged , , , ,

Town of Vernon v. United States Cert Stage Materials

Here: Cert Petition Questions presented: 1. Whether a tribe that opted out of the Indian Reorganization Act can have its status under the Act revived under the Indian Land Consolidation Act, 25 U.S.C. § 2202, even though the United States did not … Continue reading

Posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, federal recognition, fee to trust, Research, Supreme Court | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

“Sault Tribe’s trust land application denied for Lansing casino”

Here. If anyone has the denial letter, please send it along. Here it is. And here: 2017-07-24 DOI Cason ltr to Sault Ste. Marie denying mandatory trust acqn

Posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, fee to trust, IGRA, Indian gaming, Michigan Indian, News | Tagged , ,

High Country News: “Under Trump, tribal land ownership is not a priority”

Here.

Posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, fee to trust, News, trust relationship | Tagged , | 1 Comment