Tag Archives: Indian gaming
Alabama Supreme Court Rejects Tribal Immunity Defense in Two of Three Cases against Poarch Band Creek
Here are the opinions: 2017.09.29 – Harrison opinion Briefs: Harrison Brief Reply 2017.09.29 – Rape opinion We posted some briefs on the Rape case here. Additional materials here: Tribe Brief Reply 2017.09.29 – Wilkes opinion Briefs: Wilkes Brief Tribe Brief
Here is the opinion in Yavapai-Apache Nation v. La Posta Band of Diegueno Mission Indians: Yavapai-Apache Nation v La Posta Band An excerpt: This appeal arises from a contract dispute between two Indian tribes: Yavapai Apache Nation (YAN) and La Posta … Continue reading →
Here is the complaint in Spokane County v. Dept. of Interior (E.D. Wash.): Complaint An excerpt: Spokane County, Washington (“County”) brings this action seeking review of and relief from a June 15, 2015 decision by the Department of the Interior … Continue reading →
Here is the opinion in CDST-Gaming v. Comanche Nation (Ct. Indian Appeals): CDST Gaming v. Comanche Nation Lower court decision here. Related posts here, here, and here.
Here are the materials in Block v. Dakota Nation Gaming Commission (D.S.D.): 1 Complaint 5 Motion to Dismiss 9 DCT Order
Here are the materials so far in Stockbridge-Munsee Community v. State of Wisconsin (W.D. Wisc.): FINAL COMPLAINT FINAL HOLSEY AFF FINAL MEMORANDUM FINAL Motion for PI FINAL STATEMENT OF FACTS
Here is the complaint in Kalispel Tribe of Indians v. Dept. of Interior (E.D. Wash.): 1 Complaint
Here is the opinion in Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head (Aquinnah). Briefs here.
Here are the briefs: Guidiville Rancheria Opening Brief City of Richmond Brief Reply Oral argument video here. Lower court materials here.
Shane Plumer has published “Turning Gaming Dollars Into Non-Gaming Revenue: Hedging For The Seventh Generation” in the Journal of Law and Inequality’s Sua Sponte. Here is the abstract: There are four levels of diversification that tribes engage in: level one … Continue reading →