Tag Archives: North Fork Rancheria of Mono Indians

D.C. Circuit Affirms Interior Trust Acquisition for North Fork Rancheria of Mono Indians

Here is the opinion in Stand Up for California! v. Dept. of Interior: Stand Up Opinion Briefs here.

Posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, fee to trust, Indian gaming, Research | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Federal Court Rejects Casino Opponent Demand to Supplement Administrative Record with Materials on the Legal Status of Trust Land (North Fork Rancheria of Mono Indians)

Here are the materials in Club One Casino v. Dept. of Interior (E.D. Cal.): 22 motion to supplement record 25 interior response 26 reply 33 dct order

Posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, fee to trust, IGRA, Indian gaming, Research | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Competitor Challenge to North Fork Rancheria Casino Continues

Here are the materials in Club One Casino Inc. v. Dept. of Interior (E.D. Cal.): 1 Complaint 22 Motion to Supplement Administrative Record 25 Response 26 Reply 30 DCT Order

Posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, IGRA, Indian gaming, international law, Research | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Picayune Rancheria Challenge to North Fork Rancheria Gaming Fails

Here are the materials in Picayune Rancheria of Chukchansi Indians v. Dept. of Interior (E.D. Cal.): 26 North Fork Motion for Summary Judgment 29 US Brief 33 Picayune Response 35 North Fork Reply 36 US Reply 42 DCT Order

Posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, IGRA, Research | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

D.C. Circuit Briefs in Challenge to North Fork Rancheria Trust Acquisition

Here are the materials in Stand Up for California! v. Dept. of Interior: Picayune Rancheria Opening Brief Stand Up Opening Brief Federal Brief North Fork Rancheria of Mono Indians Brief Picayune Reply Stand Up Reply Lower court materials here.

Posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, fee to trust, IGRA, Research | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Split Cal. COA Holds Gov. Brown’s Concurrence in North Fork Compact is Invalid

Here are the opinions in Stand Up For California v. State of California (PDF). An excerpt from the lead opinion: The judgment is reversed. The Governor’s concurrence is invalid under the facts alleged in this case. Plaintiffs have stated a … Continue reading

Posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, IGRA, Indian gaming, Research | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Picayune Rancheria Files Complaint Against DOI to Stop Off Reservation Gaming

Download complaint here. Link to news coverage here.

Posted in Author: Sarah Donnelly, economic development, IGRA, Indian gaming, News, Research | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

California Court of Appeals Briefs in Stand Up for California v. State of California

Here: North Fork Rancheria Opening Brief California Answer Brief Stand Up for California Answer Brief North Fork Reply

Posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, gaming, IGRA, Research | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Third Amended Complaint and Answer in Stand Up For California v. Dept. of Interior

Here: 103 Third Amended Complaint 105 Interior Answer Prior posts here, here, here, and here.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Update in Stand Up for California v. Jewell

Here: 85 Motion to Supplement Admin Record 89 US Opposition 92 Reply re Motion to Supplement Prior post here.

Posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, fee to trust, gaming, IGRA, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments