Tag Archives: Southern District of California
Here are the materials in Williams & Cochrane LLP v. Quechan Tribe of the Fort Yuma Reservation (S.D. Cal.): 50-1 motion to dismiss 51-1 motion to disqualify 53-1 rosette motion to dismiss 73 williams response to 50 74 williams response … Continue reading →
Here are the materials in Munoz v. Barona Band of Mission Indians (S.D. Cal.): 4-1 Motion to Dismiss 5 Response 7 Reply 10 DCT Order
Here are the materials in Alegre v. Zinke (S.D.Cal.): 20-1 Motion to Dismiss 28-1 Response 33 Reply 43 DCT Order And here are the materials in the companion case Alegre v. United States (S.D. Cal.): 6 Motion for TRO 16-1 … Continue reading →
Federal Court Partially Dismisses Pauma Band Claims against California’s Use of Gaming Compact Special Distribution Fund
Here are the materials in Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pauma & Yuima Reservation v. State of California (S.D. Cal.): 19-1 Motion to Dismiss 22 Opposition 25 Reply 26 DCT Order
Here are the materials in Protect Our Communities Foundation v. Black (S.D. Cal.): 59-1 POCF Motion for Summary J 61-1 Tule Wind Cross Motion 64 Federal Motion 66 POCF Response 74 Federal Reply 75 Tule Wind Reply 80EWI Order Granting … Continue reading →
Here are the materials in State of California v. Iipay Nation of Santa Ysabel (S.D. Cal.): 61 US Motion 63 CA Motion 67 Tribal Response 68 US Reply 69 CA Reply 80 DCT Order Granting US Motion Prior post here.
Here are the materials in Acres v. Blue Lake Rancheria Tribal Court, 16-cv-02622 (N.D. Cali.): Doc. 9 Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss Doc. 11 Plaintiff’s Memo and Points of Authorities Opposing Defendants’ MTD Doc. 21 Order Transferring Case … Continue reading →
Here are the materials in Protect Our Communities Foundation v. Black (S.D. Cal.): 33 Tule Wind Motion 34-1 Ewiiaapaayp Band of Kumeyaay Indians Motion 35-1 US Motion38 Opposition 43 Ewiiaapaayp Band of Kumeyaay Indians Reply 44 Tule Wind Reply 45 … Continue reading →
Here is the complaint and exhibits in Acres v. Blue Lake Rancheria Tribal Court (S.D. Cal.): Complaint The tribe’s tribal court complaint against acres begins on page 50 of the pdf above.
Here is the opinion in Pauma Band of Luiseño Indians v. State of California. From the court’s syllabus: Affirming the district court’s summary judgment, the panel held that the Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission Indians was entitled to rescission of the … Continue reading →