Tag Archives: Stand Up for California! v. Dept. of Interior

Stand Up For California v. Dept. of Interior Cert Petition

Here: sufc cert petition Questions presented: 1. This case presents the question whether the Secretary may conclude that a casino “would not be detrimental to the surrounding community” despite uncontroverted evidence the casino will have unmitigated detrimental impacts to the community. … Continue reading

Posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, fee to trust, IGRA, Indian gaming, Research, Supreme Court | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Federal Court Rejects Challenge to Wilton Rancheria Trust Acquisition Made by Acting Interior Official

Here are the materials in Stand Up for California! v. Dept. of Interior (D.D.C.): 33 Stand Up Motion for Summary J 40 Interior Cross Motion 41 Wilton Rancheria Cross Motion 45 Stand Up Reply 49 Wilton Reply 50 Interior Reply … Continue reading

Posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, fee to trust, Indian gaming, Research | Tagged , , ,

D.C. Circuit Affirms Interior Trust Acquisition for North Fork Rancheria of Mono Indians

Here is the opinion in Stand Up for California! v. Dept. of Interior: Stand Up Opinion Briefs here.

Posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, fee to trust, Indian gaming, Research | Tagged , , , ,

D.C. Circuit Briefs in Challenge to North Fork Rancheria Trust Acquisition

Here are the materials in Stand Up for California! v. Dept. of Interior: Picayune Rancheria Opening Brief Stand Up Opening Brief Federal Brief North Fork Rancheria of Mono Indians Brief Picayune Reply Stand Up Reply Lower court materials here.

Posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, fee to trust, IGRA, Research | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Federal Court Rules in Favor of North Fork Rancheria in Gaming Conflict

Here are the materials in Stand Up for California v. Dept. of Interior (D.D.C.): 106-1-sufc-motion-for-summary-j 108-1-picayune-rancheria-motion-for-summary-j 111-1-north-fork-rancheria-motion-for-summary-j 112-1-us-motion-for-summary-j 115-sufc-reply 116-picayune-reply 121-north-fork-rancheria-reply 122-us-reply 169-dct-order Prior posts here, here, here, here, and here.

Posted in fee to trust, IGRA, Research | Tagged , , , , | 1 Comment

Third Amended Complaint and Answer in Stand Up For California v. Dept. of Interior

Here: 103 Third Amended Complaint 105 Interior Answer Prior posts here, here, here, and here.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , ,

Update in Stand Up for California v. Jewell

Here: 85 Motion to Supplement Admin Record 89 US Opposition 92 Reply re Motion to Supplement Prior post here.

Posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, fee to trust, gaming, IGRA, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Updated Materials in Challenge to North Fork Casino Proposal

Here are updated materials in Stand Up for California! v. Dept. of Interior (D.D.C.): 85 Motion to Supplement Admin Record 86 North Fork Rancheria Answer 87 Federal Defendants Answer Amended complaint here.

Posted in Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, fee to trust, gaming, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Second Amended Complaint in Stand Up for California v. Dept. of Interior

Here: 84 Second Amended Complaint Prior post on this matter here. The district court previously had stayed the case: 77 DCT Stay Order A related state court complaint is here.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

Federal Court Rejects Carcieri/NEPA/Other Challenges to North Fork Rancheria Trust Acquisition

Here are the materials in Stand Up for California! v. Dept. of Interior (D. D.C.): Memorandum Opinion Interior Motion to Change Venue Stand Up Motion pt 1 Stand Up Motion pt 2 Stand Up Motion pt 3 Picayune Rancheria Memorandum … Continue reading

Posted in Author: Bryan Newland, Author: Matthew L.M. Fletcher, fee to trust, gaming, Research | Tagged , , , , , , , | 4 Comments