Tag Archives: tribal courts
Grant Christensen has posted “Civil Rights Notes: American Indians and Banishment, Jury Trials, and the Doctrine of Lenity,” forthcoming in the William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal. The syllabus: Indian defendants appearing before tribal courts are not protected by … Continue reading →
Paul Spruhan has posted “Guardians of Tribal Tradition: Litigation in the Navajo Nation” in Litigation, The Journal of ABA Section of Litigation.
Tulalip Tribal Court Denies Summary Judgment, Affirms In Rem Jurisdiction Versus State over Items Seized Pursuant to Search Warrant
Here are the materials in Shopbell v. Washington Dept. of Fish and Wildlife (Tulalip Tribal Court): 4-6-17 Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Support of Motion 4-24-17 Plaintiff’s Cross Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Re Probable Cause 5-2-17 … Continue reading →
Here: PM Announcement
Here is the complaint in Navajo Nation v. United States (D.D.C.): 1 Complaint
Link: Proposed Rule 10 The Minnesota Tribal Court State Court forum is petitioning the Minnesota Supreme Court for a new and improved rule on the recognition of tribal court judgments in state courts, known as Rule 10 of the Minnesota … Continue reading →
Here are the materials in Northern Arapaho Tribe v. LaCounte (D. Mont.): 115 NAT Motion for TRO 123 Federal Response 127 Reply 147 DCT Order Denying Motion for TRO An excerpt: Negotiations concerning the operation of the two courts are ongoing. … Continue reading →
The agreement allows for law enforcement officers in Alaska to refer certain misdemeanor crimes and offenses to participating tribal courts for restorative justice sentencing. It’s the first of its kind agreement in Alaska and the Anvik tribe located in Anvik, … Continue reading →
Here is the opinion in Shopbell v. State of Washington Dept. of Fish and Wildlife: shopbell-opinion We posted materials on this case here.
According to Larry Nesper: The Supreme Court of Wisconsin today, June 21, in an administrative hearing, voted to indefinitely extend the Discretionary Transfer Rule permitting state court judges to transfer cases to tribal court on their own authority. It had … Continue reading →